PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Acessa Health Inc. vs Itamar Medical Inc

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Itamar Medical Inc has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 4,917, versus 919 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 0.7% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Acessa Health Inc.
HHI 919 · top recipient 0.2%
Ranked #1,060 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Itamar Medical Inc
HHI 4,917 · top recipient 0.7%
Ranked #375 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Company A

Acessa Health Inc.

Total Payments
$780.9K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
434
Avg per Transaction
$1.8K
Recipients
430
Avg per Recipient
$1.8K
Payment Types
3
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee
Company B

Itamar Medical Inc

Total Payments
$778.2K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
1,602
Avg per Transaction
$485.77
Recipients
1,600
Avg per Recipient
$486.38
Payment Types
3
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Acessa Health Inc. vs Itamar Medical Inc - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Acessa Health Inc.$780.9KItamar Medical Inc$778.2K

Payment Types Breakdown

Acessa Health Inc.

Consulting Fee $731.1K

93.6%

Travel and Lodging $31.1K

4.0%

Food and Beverage $5.0K

0.6%

Itamar Medical Inc

Consulting Fee $403.5K

51.8%

Food and Beverage $67.5K

8.7%

Charitable Contribution $6.1K

0.8%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Acessa Health Inc.

  1. 1

    STEVE YU

    $140,909.37 · 59 txns

  2. 2

    OTIS LAWRENCE STITT

    $124,671.76 · 71 txns

  3. 3

    LINDA LACY

    $76,410.09 · 40 txns

  4. 4

    KEITH AQUA

    $63,266.34 · 35 txns

  5. 5

    KEITH RAMSEY

    $49,395.68 · 15 txns

Itamar Medical Inc

  1. 1

    CHANDRA MATADEEN-ALI

    $327,901.42 · 14 txns

  2. 2

    ALAN SCHWARTZ

    $65,093.15 · 8 txns

  3. 3

    MATTHEW EVAN SCHMITT

    $10,495.77 · 3 txns

  4. 4

    OMAR E. BURSCHTIN

    $3,628.76 · 2 txns

  5. 5

    DAVID RAWITSCHER

    $3,090.85 · 4 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Acessa Health Inc. Itamar Medical Inc
Total Payments $780.9K $778.2K
% of Industry Total 0.0% 0.0%
Transaction Count 434 1,602
Avg per Transaction $1.8K $485.77
Recipient Count 430 1,600
Avg per Recipient $1.8K $486.38
Payment Type Count 3 3
Top Payment Type Consulting Fee Consulting Fee

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.