PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Lupin Inc. vs Prexion, Inc.

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Prexion, Inc. has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 2,195, versus 1,015 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 0.4% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Lupin Inc.
HHI 1,015 · top recipient 0.1%
Ranked #1,025 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Prexion, Inc.
HHI 2,195 · top recipient 0.4%
Ranked #719 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Company A

Lupin Inc.

Total Payments
$31.5K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
35
Avg per Transaction
$900.83
Recipients
12
Avg per Recipient
$2.6K
Payment Types
1
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee
Company B

Prexion, Inc.

Total Payments
$31.5K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
23
Avg per Transaction
$1.4K
Recipients
23
Avg per Recipient
$1.4K
Payment Types
1
Top Payment Type
Honoraria

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Lupin Inc. vs Prexion, Inc. - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Lupin Inc.$31.5KPrexion, Inc.$31.5K

Payment Types Breakdown

Lupin Inc.

Consulting Fee $30.4K

96.4%

Prexion, Inc.

Honoraria $31.5K

100.0%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Lupin Inc.

  1. 1

    PETER KANG

    $3,900.00 · 1 txns

  2. 2

    CHAD HEATWOLE

    $3,900.00 · 1 txns

  3. 3

    JUSTIN OLDHAM

    $3,766.00 · 2 txns

  4. 4

    PERRY SHIEH

    $3,250.00 · 1 txns

  5. 5

    MATTHEW WICKLUND

    $2,925.00 · 1 txns

Prexion, Inc.

  1. 1

    BARETT ANDREASEN

    $12,000.00 · 8 txns

  2. 2

    SUSAN MCMAHON

    $6,000.00 · 6 txns

  3. 3

    Lou Graham

    $4,000.00 · 2 txns

  4. 4

    SAM SHAMARDI

    $3,500.00 · 2 txns

  5. 5

    CHAD DUPLANTIS

    $2,000.00 · 2 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Lupin Inc. Prexion, Inc.
Total Payments $31.5K $31.5K
% of Industry Total 0.0% 0.0%
Transaction Count 35 23
Avg per Transaction $900.83 $1.4K
Recipient Count 12 23
Avg per Recipient $2.6K $1.4K
Payment Type Count 1 1
Top Payment Type Consulting Fee Honoraria

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.