PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Orchard Therapeutics North America vs Fujirebio Diagnostics, Incorporated

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Fujirebio Diagnostics, Incorporated has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 9,489, versus 1,853 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 1.0% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Orchard Therapeutics North America
HHI 1,853 · top recipient 0.3%
Ranked #778 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Fujirebio Diagnostics, Incorporated
HHI 9,489 · top recipient 1.0%
Ranked #156 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Total Payments
$2.2M
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
77
Avg per Transaction
$29.1K
Recipients
69
Avg per Recipient
$32.5K
Payment Types
3
Top Payment Type
Travel and Lodging
Total Payments
$2.2M
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
16
Avg per Transaction
$140.4K
Recipients
10
Avg per Recipient
$224.6K
Payment Types
2
Top Payment Type
Royalty or License

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Orchard Therapeutics North America vs Fujirebio Diagnostics, Incorporated - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Fujirebio Diagnostics, Inco…$2.2MOrchard Therapeutics North…$2.2M

Payment Types Breakdown

Orchard Therapeutics North America

Travel and Lodging $8.4K

0.4%

Consulting Fee $3.0K

0.1%

Food and Beverage $2.6K

0.1%

Fujirebio Diagnostics, Incorporated

Royalty or License $2.1M

93.5%

Consulting Fee $45.8K

2.0%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Orchard Therapeutics North America

  1. 1

    LAURA ADANG

    $4,018.76 · 18 txns

  2. 2

    LOUIS COHEN

    $3,040.00 · 1 txns

  3. 3

    JENNIFER BRAUN

    $2,359.10 · 14 txns

  4. 4

    LISA TENNYSON EMRICK

    $1,746.40 · 8 txns

  5. 5

    SUHAG PARIKH

    $1,161.57 · 8 txns

Fujirebio Diagnostics, Incorporated

  1. 1

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    $2,088,717.00 · 4 txns

  2. 2

    Robert Charles Knapp

    $26,250.00 · 3 txns

  3. 3

    Richard G. Moore

    $19,519.78 · 2 txns

  4. 4

    University Of Washington Med Ctr

    $10,000.00 · 1 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Orchard Therapeutics North America Fujirebio Diagnostics, Incorporated
Total Payments $2.2M $2.2M
% of Industry Total 0.0% 0.0%
Transaction Count 77 16
Avg per Transaction $29.1K $140.4K
Recipient Count 69 10
Avg per Recipient $32.5K $224.6K
Payment Type Count 3 2
Top Payment Type Travel and Lodging Royalty or License

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.