CMS Open Payments · Tool
OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc. vs National Marrow Donor Program
Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.
A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.
Compare Different Companies
Relationship comparison
Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?
OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc. has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 412, versus 169 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 0.1% of that company's General Payments recipient total.
HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.
- OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc.
- HHI 412 · top recipient 0.1%
- Ranked #1,365 of 1,838 companies by HHI
- National Marrow Donor Program
- HHI 169 · top recipient 0.0%
- Ranked #1,594 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Payment Overview
OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc.
- Total Payments
- $10.1M
- % of Industry
- 0.1%
- Transactions
- 941
- Avg per Transaction
- $10.7K
- Recipients
- 917
- Avg per Recipient
- $11.0K
- Payment Types
- 4
- Top Payment Type
- Royalty or License
National Marrow Donor Program
- Total Payments
- $10.2M
- % of Industry
- 0.1%
- Transactions
- 1,835
- Avg per Transaction
- $5.5K
- Recipients
- 1,391
- Avg per Recipient
- $7.3K
- Payment Types
- 7
- Top Payment Type
- Compensation for Services Other Than Consulting
Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.
Total payments compared
OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc. vs National Marrow Donor Program - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024
Payment Types Breakdown
OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc.
1.1%
1.0%
0.5%
0.4%
National Marrow Donor Program
36.2%
2.0%
1.8%
1.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Top 5 General-Payment Recipients
This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.
OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc.
- 1
MITCHEL HARRIS
$28,266.81 · 22 txns
- 2
MICHAEL WEAVER
$26,327.78 · 14 txns
- 3
RAYMOND SMITH
$26,208.84 · 12 txns
- 4
JOHN ABRAHAM
$24,476.15 · 18 txns
- 5
KENETH BRANDON STRENGE
$13,032.92 · 16 txns
National Marrow Donor Program
- 1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
$201,735.00 · 8 txns
- 2
City Of Hope National Medical Ctr
$190,710.00 · 4 txns
- 3
Hackensack University Medical Center
$148,155.00 · 4 txns
- 4
Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital
$128,375.00 · 12 txns
- 5
University Of Kansas Hospital
$114,060.00 · 4 txns
Summary Comparison
| Metric | OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc. | National Marrow Donor Program |
|---|---|---|
| Total Payments | $10.1M | $10.2M |
| % of Industry Total | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Transaction Count | 941 | 1,835 |
| Avg per Transaction | $10.7K | $5.5K |
| Recipient Count | 917 | 1,391 |
| Avg per Recipient | $11.0K | $7.3K |
| Payment Type Count | 4 | 7 |
| Top Payment Type | Royalty or License | Compensation for Services Other Than Consulting |
Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →
Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.