PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Renalytix AI, Inc. vs Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Renalytix AI, Inc. has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 2,909, versus 233 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 0.4% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Renalytix AI, Inc.
HHI 2,909 · top recipient 0.4%
Ranked #580 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC
HHI 233 · top recipient 0.1%
Ranked #1,524 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Company A

Renalytix AI, Inc.

Total Payments
$5.9M
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
1,603
Avg per Transaction
$3.7K
Recipients
1,559
Avg per Recipient
$3.8K
Payment Types
2
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee
Total Payments
$5.9M
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
8,655
Avg per Transaction
$679.79
Recipients
7,546
Avg per Recipient
$779.70
Payment Types
3
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Renalytix AI, Inc. vs Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Renalytix AI, Inc.$5.9MCurrax Pharmaceuticals LLC$5.9M

Payment Types Breakdown

Renalytix AI, Inc.

Consulting Fee $100.0K

1.7%

Food and Beverage $31.1K

0.5%

Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC

Consulting Fee $115.7K

2.0%

Food and Beverage $104.8K

1.8%

Travel and Lodging $11.7K

0.2%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Renalytix AI, Inc.

  1. 1

    STEVEN COCA

    $50,000.00 · 10 txns

  2. 2

    GIRISH N NADKARNI

    $50,000.00 · 10 txns

  3. 3

    ARVIND MADAN

    $292.10 · 6 txns

  4. 4

    WILLIAM E TORRES

    $233.89 · 7 txns

  5. 5

    SARAH E LEMOINE

    $198.59 · 11 txns

Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC

  1. 1

    ANGELA KAY FITCH

    $17,004.41 · 14 txns

  2. 2

    JAMES DAVIS

    $11,750.00 · 3 txns

  3. 3

    MILTON LETHAN PRESSLER

    $11,040.00 · 3 txns

  4. 4

    ANGELA K GOLDEN

    $10,061.19 · 15 txns

  5. 5

    ANTHONY AURIEMMA

    $9,618.78 · 18 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Renalytix AI, Inc. Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC
Total Payments $5.9M $5.9M
% of Industry Total 0.0% 0.0%
Transaction Count 1,603 8,655
Avg per Transaction $3.7K $679.79
Recipient Count 1,559 7,546
Avg per Recipient $3.8K $779.70
Payment Type Count 2 3
Top Payment Type Consulting Fee Consulting Fee

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.