PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Sealonix Inc. vs Reichert, Inc.

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Sealonix Inc. has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 6,380, versus 1,880 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 0.8% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Sealonix Inc.
HHI 6,380 · top recipient 0.8%
Ranked #250 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Reichert, Inc.
HHI 1,880 · top recipient 0.4%
Ranked #772 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Company A

Sealonix Inc.

Total Payments
$186.9K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
31
Avg per Transaction
$6.0K
Recipients
19
Avg per Recipient
$9.8K
Payment Types
3
Top Payment Type
Space Rental or Facility Fees
Company B

Reichert, Inc.

Total Payments
$186.8K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
75
Avg per Transaction
$2.5K
Recipients
75
Avg per Recipient
$2.5K
Payment Types
2
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Sealonix Inc. vs Reichert, Inc. - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Sealonix Inc.$186.9KReichert, Inc.$186.8K

Payment Types Breakdown

Sealonix Inc.

Space Rental or Facility Fees $35.7K

19.1%

Travel and Lodging $6.7K

3.6%

Consulting Fee $2.5K

1.4%

Reichert, Inc.

Consulting Fee $184.8K

98.9%

Compensation for Services Other Than Consulting $2.0K

1.1%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Sealonix Inc.

  1. 1

    Tufts Medical Center

    $35,712.55 · 6 txns

  2. 2

    BENJAMIN P JOHNSON

    $2,000.00 · 2 txns

  3. 3

    MOHD RAASHID A SHEIKH

    $1,280.44 · 2 txns

  4. 4

    SHANKAR LAKSHMAN

    $1,073.72 · 1 txns

  5. 5

    GAURAV BHARTI

    $909.40 · 1 txns

Reichert, Inc.

  1. 1

    April Lov Jasper DR

    $67,840.00 · 16 txns

  2. 2

    Lisa Marie Genovese DR

    $27,999.00 · 1 txns

  3. 3

    Felipe A Medeiros DR

    $18,000.00 · 12 txns

  4. 4

    Justin A Schweitzer DR

    $16,500.00 · 13 txns

  5. 5

    Inder Paul Singh DR

    $12,500.00 · 9 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Sealonix Inc. Reichert, Inc.
Total Payments $186.9K $186.8K
% of Industry Total 0.0% 0.0%
Transaction Count 31 75
Avg per Transaction $6.0K $2.5K
Recipient Count 19 75
Avg per Recipient $9.8K $2.5K
Payment Type Count 3 2
Top Payment Type Space Rental or Facility Fees Consulting Fee

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.