PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Catalyst OrthoScience vs Insmed, Inc.

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Catalyst OrthoScience has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 2,229, versus 148 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 34.4% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Catalyst OrthoScience
HHI 2,229 · top recipient 34.4%
Ranked #710 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Insmed, Inc.
HHI 148 · top recipient 5.3%
Ranked #1,628 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Total Payments
$11.8M
% of Industry
0.1%
Transactions
448
Avg per Transaction
$26.4K
Recipients
424
Avg per Recipient
$27.9K
Payment Types
4
Top Payment Type
Royalty or License
Company B

Insmed, Inc.

Total Payments
$12.0M
% of Industry
0.1%
Transactions
24,801
Avg per Transaction
$484.52
Recipients
13,950
Avg per Recipient
$861.40
Payment Types
6
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Catalyst OrthoScience vs Insmed, Inc. - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Insmed, Inc.$12.0MCatalyst OrthoScience$11.8M

General Payment Types Breakdown

Category shares use each company's General Payments total, not the all-tracks (General + Research + Ownership) hero figure.

Catalyst OrthoScience

Royalty or License $406.5K

65.7%

Consulting Fee $172.5K

27.9%

Food and Beverage $28.9K

4.7%

Travel and Lodging $11.1K

1.8%

Insmed, Inc.

Consulting Fee $603.1K

56.7%

Food and Beverage $302.0K

28.4%

Travel and Lodging $71.1K

6.7%

Grant $50.0K

4.7%

Space Rental or Facility Fees $31.3K

2.9%

Education $7.0K

0.7%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Catalyst OrthoScience

  1. 1

    ZACHARY LEITZE

    $213,231.75 · 8 txns

  2. 2

    THEODORE BLAINE

    $194,148.69 · 10 txns

  3. 3

    NICHOLAS CAPITO

    $28,403.80 · 13 txns

  4. 4

    MIGUEL RAMIREZ

    $24,399.74 · 15 txns

  5. 5

    CAROLINE CHEBLI

    $12,311.01 · 8 txns

Insmed, Inc.

  1. 1

    National Jewish Health

    $56,000.00 · 3 txns

  2. 2

    Steven Zelenkofske

    $43,000.00 · 10 txns

  3. 3

    Wael EL MARAACHLI

    $34,092.66 · 29 txns

  4. 4

    Marianne Culkin Mann

    $34,050.00 · 3 txns

  5. 5

    Christopher J Richards

    $33,514.57 · 32 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Catalyst OrthoScience Insmed, Inc.
Total Payments $11.8M $12.0M
% of Industry Total 0.1% 0.1%
Transaction Count 448 24,801
Avg per Transaction $26.4K $484.52
Recipient Count 424 13,950
Avg per Recipient $27.9K $861.40
Payment Type Count 4 6
Top Payment Type Royalty or License Consulting Fee

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.