PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Clinical Laserthermia Systems Americas Inc. vs Metacel Pharmaceuticals LLC

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Clinical Laserthermia Systems Americas Inc. has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 1,414, versus 123 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 29.9% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Clinical Laserthermia Systems Americas Inc.
HHI 1,414 · top recipient 29.9%
Ranked #894 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Metacel Pharmaceuticals LLC
HHI 123 · top recipient 2.4%
Ranked #1,653 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Total Payments
$1.7K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
40
Avg per Transaction
$43.28
Recipients
40
Avg per Recipient
$43.28
Payment Types
2
Top Payment Type
Food and Beverage
Total Payments
$1.7K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
92
Avg per Transaction
$18.90
Recipients
92
Avg per Recipient
$18.90
Payment Types
1
Top Payment Type
Food and Beverage

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Clinical Laserthermia Systems Americas Inc. vs Metacel Pharmaceuticals LLC - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Metacel Pharmaceuticals LLC$1.7KClinical Laserthermia Syste…$1.7K

General Payment Types Breakdown

Category shares use each company's General Payments total, not the all-tracks (General + Research + Ownership) hero figure.

Clinical Laserthermia Systems Americas Inc.

Food and Beverage $1.2K

70.8%

Travel and Lodging $506.24

29.2%

Metacel Pharmaceuticals LLC

Food and Beverage $1.7K

100.0%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Clinical Laserthermia Systems Americas Inc.

  1. 1

    AMIT GUPTA

    $517.61 · 4 txns

  2. 2

    SIJO JOSEPH PAREKATTIL

    $189.84 · 12 txns

  3. 3

    LAURA R BRUMBAUGH

    $167.78 · 11 txns

  4. 4

    JOSEPH ANTHONY ALTAMIRANDO

    $135.28 · 1 txns

  5. 5

    ALI KASRAEIAN

    $135.28 · 1 txns

Metacel Pharmaceuticals LLC

  1. 1

    EHAB M KODSI

    $41.53 · 2 txns

  2. 2

    JACOB THOMAS BOLZ

    $33.29 · 1 txns

  3. 3

    BRIAN KIMKYONE GAW

    $30.36 · 1 txns

  4. 4

    SUNITHA LENA NUNE

    $29.16 · 1 txns

  5. 5

    JOSHUA DAVID LOEB

    $29.16 · 1 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Clinical Laserthermia Systems Americas Inc. Metacel Pharmaceuticals LLC
Total Payments $1.7K $1.7K
% of Industry Total 0.0% 0.0%
Transaction Count 40 92
Avg per Transaction $43.28 $18.90
Recipient Count 40 92
Avg per Recipient $43.28 $18.90
Payment Type Count 2 1
Top Payment Type Food and Beverage Food and Beverage

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.