PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Innovation Technologies Inc vs Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Gilead Sciences, Inc. has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 168, versus 8 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 10.8% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Innovation Technologies Inc
HHI 8 · top recipient 0.6%
Ranked #1,832 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
HHI 168 · top recipient 10.8%
Ranked #1,596 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Total Payments
$75.8M
% of Industry
0.5%
Transactions
3,475
Avg per Transaction
$21.8K
Recipients
3,361
Avg per Recipient
$22.5K
Payment Types
2
Top Payment Type
Food and Beverage
Total Payments
$72.7M
% of Industry
0.5%
Transactions
121,377
Avg per Transaction
$598.70
Recipients
118,932
Avg per Recipient
$611.01
Payment Types
8
Top Payment Type
Grant

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Innovation Technologies Inc vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Innovation Technologies Inc$75.8MGilead Sciences, Inc.$72.7M

General Payment Types Breakdown

Category shares use each company's General Payments total, not the all-tracks (General + Research + Ownership) hero figure.

Innovation Technologies Inc

Food and Beverage $204.8K

99.9%

Entertainment $181.17

0.1%

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Grant $15.7M

39.7%

Compensation for Services Other Than Consulting $10.6M

26.8%

Consulting Fee $5.4M

13.6%

Food and Beverage $3.6M

9.1%

Travel and Lodging $2.5M

6.4%

Royalty or License $1.1M

2.9%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Innovation Technologies Inc

  1. 1

    DARREN SACHS

    $1,256.98 · 10 txns

  2. 2

    DIPAK RAMKUMAR

    $1,254.78 · 8 txns

  3. 3

    PAUL NAYLOR

    $1,062.47 · 10 txns

  4. 4

    STEPHEN WATKINS

    $823.27 · 10 txns

  5. 5

    DAVID OTTERBURN

    $683.06 · 2 txns

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

  1. 1

    Emory University Hospital

    $4,269,910.88 · 21 txns

  2. 2

    Ochsner Clinic Foundation

    $1,465,691.70 · 25 txns

  3. 3

    University Of Washington Med Ctr

    $1,201,838.91 · 17 txns

  4. 4

    Ph Patewood Hospital

    $701,326.00 · 6 txns

  5. 5

    Hackensack University Medical Center

    $613,813.00 · 6 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Innovation Technologies Inc Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Total Payments $75.8M $72.7M
% of Industry Total 0.5% 0.5%
Transaction Count 3,475 121,377
Avg per Transaction $21.8K $598.70
Recipient Count 3,361 118,932
Avg per Recipient $22.5K $611.01
Payment Type Count 2 8
Top Payment Type Food and Beverage Grant

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.