PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Lupin Inc. vs ProgenaCare Global, LLC

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

ProgenaCare Global, LLC has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 2,943, versus 1,015 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 52.7% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Lupin Inc.
HHI 1,015 · top recipient 12.8%
Ranked #1,025 of 1,838 companies by HHI
ProgenaCare Global, LLC
HHI 2,943 · top recipient 52.7%
Ranked #576 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Company A

Lupin Inc.

Total Payments
$31.5K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
35
Avg per Transaction
$900.83
Recipients
12
Avg per Recipient
$2.6K
Payment Types
1
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee
Total Payments
$31.3K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
385
Avg per Transaction
$81.36
Recipients
385
Avg per Recipient
$81.36
Payment Types
3
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Lupin Inc. vs ProgenaCare Global, LLC - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Lupin Inc.$31.5KProgenaCare Global, LLC$31.3K

General Payment Types Breakdown

Category shares use each company's General Payments total, not the all-tracks (General + Research + Ownership) hero figure.

Lupin Inc.

Consulting Fee $30.4K

100.0%

ProgenaCare Global, LLC

Consulting Fee $12.9K

41.3%

Food and Beverage $12.3K

39.1%

Travel and Lodging $6.1K

19.5%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Lupin Inc.

  1. 1

    PETER KANG

    $3,900.00 · 1 txns

  2. 2

    CHAD HEATWOLE

    $3,900.00 · 1 txns

  3. 3

    JUSTIN OLDHAM

    $3,766.00 · 2 txns

  4. 4

    PERRY SHIEH

    $3,250.00 · 1 txns

  5. 5

    MATTHEW WICKLUND

    $2,925.00 · 1 txns

ProgenaCare Global, LLC

  1. 1

    JOHN STEPHEN STARINSKI

    $16,520.77 · 30 txns

  2. 2

    GREGORY SHEREMETA

    $3,742.74 · 20 txns

  3. 3

    DANIEL EA THOMAS

    $485.45 · 1 txns

  4. 4

    SHAWN LESLIE REISER

    $429.56 · 16 txns

  5. 5

    SARAH CHRISTINE HEWITT

    $420.45 · 14 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Lupin Inc. ProgenaCare Global, LLC
Total Payments $31.5K $31.3K
% of Industry Total 0.0% 0.0%
Transaction Count 35 385
Avg per Transaction $900.83 $81.36
Recipient Count 12 385
Avg per Recipient $2.6K $81.36
Payment Type Count 1 3
Top Payment Type Consulting Fee Consulting Fee

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.