CMS Open Payments · Tool
MIMEDX Group, Inc. vs Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.
Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.
A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.
Compare Different Companies
Relationship comparison
Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?
MIMEDX Group, Inc. has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 364, versus 113 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 10.7% of that company's General Payments recipient total.
HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.
- MIMEDX Group, Inc.
- HHI 364 · top recipient 10.7%
- Ranked #1,404 of 1,838 companies by HHI
- Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.
- HHI 113 · top recipient 4.1%
- Ranked #1,669 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Payment Overview
MIMEDX Group, Inc.
- Total Payments
- $3.4M
- % of Industry
- 0.0%
- Transactions
- 12,164
- Avg per Transaction
- $276.92
- Recipients
- 12,157
- Avg per Recipient
- $277.08
- Payment Types
- 4
- Top Payment Type
- Consulting Fee
Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.
- Total Payments
- $3.3M
- % of Industry
- 0.0%
- Transactions
- 19,792
- Avg per Transaction
- $168.73
- Recipients
- 19,684
- Avg per Recipient
- $169.65
- Payment Types
- 6
- Top Payment Type
- Food and Beverage
Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.
Total payments compared
MIMEDX Group, Inc. vs Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024
General Payment Types Breakdown
Category shares use each company's General Payments total, not the all-tracks (General + Research + Ownership) hero figure.
MIMEDX Group, Inc.
49.2%
34.6%
11.9%
4.4%
Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.
43.4%
40.5%
9.8%
5.8%
0.4%
0.0%
Top 5 General-Payment Recipients
This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.
MIMEDX Group, Inc.
- 1
CATO LAURENCIN
$355,912.60 · 30 txns
- 2
INOVA FAIRFAX HOSPITAL
$351,600.00 · 50 txns
- 3
PHYLLIS I GARDNER
$319,668.75 · 4 txns
- 4
MEGAN OLTMANN
$84,040.95 · 63 txns
- 5
ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO
$64,800.00 · 51 txns
Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.
- 1
FRANCIS S MAH
$47,389.28 · 57 txns
- 2
RICHARD ADLER
$46,292.55 · 78 txns
- 3
JESSICA STEEN
$41,355.93 · 80 txns
- 4
PAMELA THERIOT
$37,903.90 · 67 txns
- 5
DAMON DIERKER
$29,995.89 · 41 txns
Summary Comparison
| Metric | MIMEDX Group, Inc. | Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Total Payments | $3.4M | $3.3M |
| % of Industry Total | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Transaction Count | 12,164 | 19,792 |
| Avg per Transaction | $276.92 | $168.73 |
| Recipient Count | 12,157 | 19,684 |
| Avg per Recipient | $277.08 | $169.65 |
| Payment Type Count | 4 | 6 |
| Top Payment Type | Consulting Fee | Food and Beverage |
Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →
Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.