PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Rti Surgical, Inc vs Aurora Spine, Inc.

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Rti Surgical, Inc has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 982, versus 836 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 20.4% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Rti Surgical, Inc
HHI 982 · top recipient 20.4%
Ranked #1,038 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Aurora Spine, Inc.
HHI 836 · top recipient 14.2%
Ranked #1,100 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Company A

Rti Surgical, Inc

Total Payments
$1.4M
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
830
Avg per Transaction
$1.7K
Recipients
821
Avg per Recipient
$1.8K
Payment Types
5
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee
Company B

Aurora Spine, Inc.

Total Payments
$1.4M
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
186
Avg per Transaction
$7.6K
Recipients
186
Avg per Recipient
$7.6K
Payment Types
3
Top Payment Type
Consulting Fee

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Rti Surgical, Inc vs Aurora Spine, Inc. - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Rti Surgical, Inc$1.4MAurora Spine, Inc.$1.4M

General Payment Types Breakdown

Category shares use each company's General Payments total, not the all-tracks (General + Research + Ownership) hero figure.

Rti Surgical, Inc

Consulting Fee $667.9K

47.7%

Royalty or License $496.1K

35.4%

Honoraria $158.4K

11.3%

Food and Beverage $48.0K

3.4%

Education $30.4K

2.2%

Aurora Spine, Inc.

Consulting Fee $876.2K

61.7%

Royalty or License $532.9K

37.5%

Travel and Lodging $11.8K

0.8%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Rti Surgical, Inc

  1. 1

    Suhail Khuzema Kanchwala

    $286,200.00 · 22 txns

  2. 2

    DAVID N ARMSTRONG

    $251,306.34 · 8 txns

  3. 3

    Marek Fried

    $146,040.00 · 12 txns

  4. 4

    Luther Hamilton Holton III

    $94,869.04 · 13 txns

  5. 5

    Terence Michael Myckatyn

    $49,213.89 · 7 txns

Aurora Spine, Inc.

  1. 1

    SEBASTIAN KOGA

    $202,268.86 · 17 txns

  2. 2

    STEVEN FALOWSKI

    $170,610.07 · 14 txns

  3. 3

    PANKAJ MEHTA

    $161,943.56 · 16 txns

  4. 4

    TIFFANY ROGERS

    $125,815.66 · 12 txns

  5. 5

    DANIEL BARBA

    $110,434.25 · 11 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Rti Surgical, Inc Aurora Spine, Inc.
Total Payments $1.4M $1.4M
% of Industry Total 0.0% 0.0%
Transaction Count 830 186
Avg per Transaction $1.7K $7.6K
Recipient Count 821 186
Avg per Recipient $1.8K $7.6K
Payment Type Count 5 3
Top Payment Type Consulting Fee Consulting Fee

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.