CMS Open Payments · Tool
Scientia Vascular vs ITI, Inc. (d/b/a Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.)
Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.
A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.
Compare Different Companies
Relationship comparison
Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?
Scientia Vascular has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 2,293, versus 52 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 33.1% of that company's General Payments recipient total.
HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.
- Scientia Vascular
- HHI 2,293 · top recipient 33.1%
- Ranked #695 of 1,838 companies by HHI
- ITI, Inc. (d/b/a Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.)
- HHI 52 · top recipient 1.5%
- Ranked #1,759 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Payment Overview
Scientia Vascular
- Total Payments
- $46.9M
- % of Industry
- 0.3%
- Transactions
- 228
- Avg per Transaction
- $205.8K
- Recipients
- 191
- Avg per Recipient
- $245.6K
- Payment Types
- 3
- Top Payment Type
- Consulting Fee
- Total Payments
- $47.9M
- % of Industry
- 0.3%
- Transactions
- 146,137
- Avg per Transaction
- $327.73
- Recipients
- 137,083
- Avg per Recipient
- $349.38
- Payment Types
- 7
- Top Payment Type
- Compensation for Services Other Than Consulting
Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.
Total payments compared
Scientia Vascular vs ITI, Inc. (d/b/a Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.) - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024
General Payment Types Breakdown
Category shares use each company's General Payments total, not the all-tracks (General + Research + Ownership) hero figure.
Scientia Vascular
83.5%
10.0%
6.5%
ITI, Inc. (d/b/a Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.)
54.9%
28.3%
8.6%
7.5%
0.4%
0.3%
Top 5 General-Payment Recipients
This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.
Scientia Vascular
- 1
ADAM ARTHUR
$61,118.00 · 13 txns
- 2
David Fiorella
$60,000.00 · 12 txns
- 3
JOHN DEVEIKIS
$19,755.42 · 14 txns
- 4
DANIEL SAHLEIN
$4,805.62 · 11 txns
- 5
HARIS KAMAL
$4,020.16 · 9 txns
ITI, Inc. (d/b/a Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.)
- 1
ANDREW CUTLER
$164,049.60 · 154 txns
- 2
HENRY NASRALLAH
$142,165.88 · 115 txns
- 3
CHARLES NGUYEN
$133,582.76 · 142 txns
- 4
JOHN FENLEY
$125,004.36 · 163 txns
- 5
NIKU SINGH
$120,501.93 · 135 txns
Summary Comparison
| Metric | Scientia Vascular | ITI, Inc. (d/b/a Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Payments | $46.9M | $47.9M |
| % of Industry Total | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Transaction Count | 228 | 146,137 |
| Avg per Transaction | $205.8K | $327.73 |
| Recipient Count | 191 | 137,083 |
| Avg per Recipient | $245.6K | $349.38 |
| Payment Type Count | 3 | 7 |
| Top Payment Type | Consulting Fee | Compensation for Services Other Than Consulting |
Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →
Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.