PlainPharmaWatch

CMS Open Payments · Tool

Swan Valley Medical Incorporated vs Spinevision SAS

Side-by-side comparison of CMS Open Payments data for Program Year 2024. Select different companies below to start a new comparison.

A larger reported total is not "better" or "worse", it is a neutral fact about disclosure volume; a reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing.

Compare Different Companies

vs

Relationship comparison

Which recorded payment profile is more concentrated?

Swan Valley Medical Incorporated has the more concentrated recorded General Payments recipient profile in Program Year 2024: its recipient-distribution HHI is 8,507, versus 5,765 for the other company. Its single largest recorded recipient represents 91.9% of that company's General Payments recipient total.

HHI summarizes how payments are distributed across recorded recipients: higher means a less evenly distributed recipient pattern. This is a description of CMS-reported General Payments only, not a finding about conduct, prescribing, quality, or wrongdoing. Read it with the recipient count and underlying records below.

Swan Valley Medical Incorporated
HHI 8,507 · top recipient 91.9%
Ranked #190 of 1,838 companies by HHI
Spinevision SAS
HHI 5,765 · top recipient 73.7%
Ranked #278 of 1,838 companies by HHI

Payment Overview

Total Payments
$65.3K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
49
Avg per Transaction
$1.3K
Recipients
7
Avg per Recipient
$9.3K
Payment Types
4
Top Payment Type
Grant
Company B

Spinevision SAS

Total Payments
$66.0K
% of Industry
0.0%
Transactions
12
Avg per Transaction
$5.5K
Recipients
12
Avg per Recipient
$5.5K
Payment Types
4
Top Payment Type
Royalty or License

Highlighted values indicate the higher figure for each metric.

Total payments compared

Swan Valley Medical Incorporated vs Spinevision SAS - total reported payments in CMS Open Payments PY2024

Spinevision SAS$66.0KSwan Valley Medical Incorpo…$65.3K

General Payment Types Breakdown

Category shares use each company's General Payments total, not the all-tracks (General + Research + Ownership) hero figure.

Swan Valley Medical Incorporated

Grant $60.0K

91.9%

Consulting Fee $4.0K

6.1%

Travel and Lodging $927.63

1.4%

Food and Beverage $368.72

0.6%

Spinevision SAS

Royalty or License $48.4K

73.4%

Travel and Lodging $14.5K

22.0%

Consulting Fee $2.0K

3.0%

Food and Beverage $1.0K

1.5%

Top 5 General-Payment Recipients

This list uses CMS detailed General Payments records only; it excludes research and ownership/investment records, so it does not equal the all-category totals above. A reported payment documents a financial relationship, not evidence of wrongdoing; a higher total reflects reporting volume, not conduct. Verify directly at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Swan Valley Medical Incorporated

  1. 1

    Hal Brown

    $60,000.00 · 1 txns

  2. 2

    John J Smith III

    $5,209.07 · 5 txns

  3. 3

    Nicholas Westfall

    $87.28 · 1 txns

Spinevision SAS

  1. 1

    Gary Colon

    $48,608.00 · 3 txns

  2. 2

    Pawel Jankowski

    $9,966.00 · 2 txns

  3. 3

    Vivek Mehta

    $6,730.00 · 2 txns

  4. 4

    Rebecca Kuo

    $217.00 · 1 txns

  5. 5

    Hamad Farhat

    $120.00 · 1 txns

Summary Comparison

Metric Swan Valley Medical Incorporated Spinevision SAS
Total Payments $65.3K $66.0K
% of Industry Total 0.0% 0.0%
Transaction Count 49 12
Avg per Transaction $1.3K $5.5K
Recipient Count 7 12
Avg per Recipient $9.3K $5.5K
Payment Type Count 4 4
Top Payment Type Grant Royalty or License

Data Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments, Program Year 2024. Data includes general payments, research payments, and physician ownership/investment interests as required by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. All companies in the CMS Open Payments company corpus are available in the selector. Browse all companies →

Every figure on PlainPharmaWatch is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.